All these tests are described in more details in this [article](http://www.rimea.de/fileadmin/files/dok/richtlinien/r2.2.1.pdf).
The notes give hints about specific implementation in JuPedSim.
...
...
@@ -28,9 +27,9 @@ The notes give hints about specific implementation in JuPedSim.
Pedestrians should not cross walls.
-**Test 7**: Distribute pedestrian's speed according to the Table in Page 6. Four different groups are distributed according to their velocity:
1.\(v<30\)
2.\(30<v<50\)
3.\(v>50\)
1.$`v<30`$
2.$`30<v<50`$
3.$`v>50`$
4. handicapped.
Verify whether the speed values are within the specified range.
...
...
@@ -104,7 +103,7 @@ The notes give hints about specific implementation in JuPedSim.
In the simulation pedestrians disappear once they are outside therefore we check if a pedestrian goes through line `exit - displacement`.
[^rimeaNote4]:The condition of this test is not clear enough...
In the last exit there should be no jam, which means $$J_{bottleneck} >= J_{last}.$$
In the last exit there should be no jam, which means $`J_{bottleneck} >= J_{last}.`$
However, this condition is not enough to quantify a jam.
[^rimeaNote5]:The reduced speed on stairs (up) is according to Tab 1 in [Burghardt2014][#Burghardt2014].
...
...
@@ -118,7 +117,7 @@ The notes give hints about specific implementation in JuPedSim.
Therefore, we choose for $$v^0_{upstairs}$$ a Gauss-distribution with $$\mu = 0.675$$ and $$\sigma = 0.04$$.
Therefore, we choose for $`v^0_{upstairs}`$ a Gauss-distribution with $`\mu = 0.675`$ and $`\sigma = 0.04`$.
[#Burghardt2014]:http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-02447-9_27"Burghardt, Sebastian and Seyfried, Armin and Klingsch, Wolfram. Fundamental diagram of stairs: Critical review and topographical measurements. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012"
