From 680b6688cc090a0041c39fbe6aacf51d5157dc24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xin Li <lixin.reco@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 10:57:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] updated number of threads in exercise 4, intro_lab

---
 intro_lab/README.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/intro_lab/README.md b/intro_lab/README.md
index 6210aae..1ccb1a3 100644
--- a/intro_lab/README.md
+++ b/intro_lab/README.md
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ Here we are going to implement a second and a third parallel version of the [pi.
 ### Tasks and questions to be addressed
 
 1) Create two new parallel versions of the [pi.c](pi.c) / [pi.f90](pi.f90) program using the parallel construct ``#pragma omp parallel`` and a) ``#pragma omp critical`` b) ``#pragma omp atomic``.
-2) Run the two new parallel codes and take the execution time with 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 threads. Record the timing in a table.
+2) Run the two new parallel codes and take the execution time with 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 threads. Record the timing in a table.
 3) What would happen if you hadn’t used critical or atomic a shared variable?
 4) How does the execution time change varying the number of threads? Is it what you expected?
 5) Do the two versions of the code differ in performance? If so, what do you think is the reason?
-- 
GitLab